[Bug 670377] Review Request: perl-File-Finder - Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 18 05:45:47 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670377

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040203 at freenet.de

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2011-01-18 00:45:47 EST ---
This spec has several issues:

* All of your Requires: perl(Test::...) should be BuildRequires:
perl(Test::...)
These are only used inside of the testsuite and are not Require:'ed by the
actual perl module (i.e. the files below lib/)
=> Please make them BuildRequires.

* File-Finder-0.53/t/04-ffr.t depends on perl(File::Find::Rule)
=> Please add BR: perl(File::Find::Rule).


Minor issue:

* The source0-URL doesn't work for me:

# lftp -c get http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Finder-0.53.gz
get: Access failed: 404 Not Found (/modules/by-module/File/File-Finder-0.53.gz)

This is a known issue with cpan's URL redirection, which seems to have problems
in providing "by-modules" on mirrors.

I'd recommend to use the "by author" URL instead:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/ME/MERLYN/File-Finder-0.53.tar.gz


Ignorable issue:

There seems to be an implicit dependency on File::Find inside of
File::Finder::Steps.pm

ATM, I am not sure, if this is a strict dependency or if this dependency can be
treated optional. For now, this doesn't matter in practice, because
perl(File::Find) is provides by the core perl package.
=> For now this issue can be ignored, IMO.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list