[Bug 667997] Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 19 00:33:46 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667997

Mohammed Morsi <mmorsi at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmorsi at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Mohammed Morsi <mmorsi at redhat.com> 2011-01-18 19:33:45 EST ---
Will take this one

* $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rubygem-rack-mount-*
rpmbuild/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-mount-0.6.13-1.fc14.src.rpm | grep -v
unexpanded-macro
  rubygem-rack-mount.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
  rubygem-rack-mount.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
  rubygem-rack-mount.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
  rubygem-rack-mount.src: W: no-%prep-section
  rubygem-rack-mount.src: W: no-%build-section
  rubygem-rack-mount.src: W: no-%clean-section
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 76 warnings.

Can you add the missing sections (prep, build, clean), the other warnings can
be ignored

* Missing dependency, shouldn't rubygem(rack) be a Requires 

http://rubygems.org/gems/rack-mount

* MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries, rack-mount
vendorizes the multimap and regin gems, these need to be separated into their
own rpms

* Koji build is green:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2730211

* Feel free to tar up the upstream test suite and Rakefile and include and run
them in the rpm's check section. Not a requirement for approval though.

Other than that, looks good, thanks for this

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list