[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views -> drupal6-views

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 20 00:17:54 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610

Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #13 from Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> 2011-01-19 19:17:52 EST ---
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal6-views.spec
rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal6-views-2.12-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal6-views-2.12-1.fc14.src.rpm 
drupal6-views.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided drupal-views
drupal6-views.src: W: strange-permission views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz 0444L
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Writing this for posterity... Our renaming is meant to migrate toward parallel
installable drupal 6/7.  It would probably be unsafe to provide
drupal-views=6.x.2.12 because that would confuse (and drag in the whole D6
stack) for a user who has drupal7 installed and then mistakenly tries to 'yum
install drupal-views' instead of 'yum install drupal7-views'.  It's safer to
ignore the first warning I think.

The second warning can be safely ignored -- the FIX notation above is mistaking
permissions on the tarball for permissions on the installed files.

* * *
$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-views-2.12/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz ; curl -s -o
- http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz | md5sum -
2b666d68e8566f14b85cf546d643e3e5 
rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-views-2.12/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz
2b666d68e8566f14b85cf546d643e3e5  -

* * *
Build is successful (makes noarch on x86_64).

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list