[Bug 669010] Review Request: libfap - C port of Ham::APRS::FAP APRS Parser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669010

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Elwell <andrew.elwell at gmail.com> 2011-01-21 03:21:00 EST ---
Updated spec and rebuilt. 

Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/libfap.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/libfap-1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

build cleanly in mock (F14).

libfap-devel now simply contains
$ rpm -qlp ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfap-devel-1.0-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm 
/usr/include/fap.h
/usr/lib64/libfap.so

I'm leaving in the BuildRoot etc as I'd like it to be available in EPEL5 (and
I've just tested it builds OK under mock, subject to building the srpm on F14
with rpmbuild -bs --define _source_filedigest_algorithm=1 libfap.spec(

I've not expanded the acronymn APRS in the Summary as it'll take up too many
characters, but have in the Description.

rpmlint now throws a warning on the -devel about no documentation - can I
ignore this as the main package (which is a requires: for -devel) pulls it in?
(I think this was the reason I originally duplicated those files!)

[aelwell at pcitgtelwell ~]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfap-*1.0-2*
libfap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.