[Bug 665331] Review Request: perl-Imager - Perl extension for Generating 24 bit Images

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665331

--- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2011-01-21 10:59:08 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I fail to understand your rant. 
OT for bugzilla - I will try to provide a more comprehensive answer on PM.

> "yum info" or "yum search" will show you that
> the package exists.  I can understand problems with packages imported but never
> built (though it's pretty damn easy to find those as well if you bother to look
> at all), yet this isn't one of those.
Only so far: This is the 3rd time in a row that this has happened to me in
recent weeks. IMO, this gives a nice picture about the shape and usability
of Fedora's package submission/review infrastructure.

> Personally I use the convenient search box at:
I normally use repoquery and build packages against all supported fedora in
mock. This usually catches all such cases - Makes me wonder why it didn't in
these recent cases.

>   http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
> to look for pending reviews and 
>   http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/package-name
> to find information on packages that might have been created but aren't
> available in yum for some reason.  If you feel that's excessive bureaucracy
Yes, very bluntly and somewhat exaggerated said: I feel it's a muddy swamp.

> then I'm afraid there's not much anyone can do for you.
As we say in German: "Only death is certain"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.