[Bug 672543] Review Request: perl-Test-DistManifest - Author test that validates a package MANIFEST

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 25 16:52:15 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672543

Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mmaslano at redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2011-01-25 11:52:14 EST ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK

rpm -q perl-Test-DistManifest
perl-Test-DistManifest-1.009-1.fc15.noarch

rpm -q --provides perl-Test-DistManifest
perl(Test::DistManifest) = 1.009
perl-Test-DistManifest = 1.009-1.fc15
[root at arrakis ~]# rpm -q --requires perl-Test-DistManifest
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)  
perl(Module::Manifest) >= 0.07
perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.72
perl(Test::More) >= 0.62
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
perl(Carp)  
perl(Cwd)  
perl(File::Find)  
perl(File::Spec)  
perl(File::Spec::Unix)  
perl(strict)  
perl(warnings)  

Please fix and file bug on rpmlint and rpmbuild ;-)
BuildArch:    perl(File::Spec)
BuildArch:    perl(File::Spec::Unix)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list