[Bug 639874] Review Request: python-rocket - Modern, multi-threaded, comet-friendly WSGI web server

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 25 20:55:09 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639874

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Ness <jeffrey.ness at rackspace.com> 2011-01-25 15:55:08 EST ---
Here is a bit more detailed review in order to help get the package approved,
as mentioned above this is unofficial.

Good:
*rpmlint clean
* Package follows naming guidelines
* Spec file name matches package name
* License is MIT in source and spec file
* MIT is an open source license
* Spec file is legible American English
* Source matches upstream: MD5sum b0bfa3bca9d30838c5dec4a083fbd247
* Builds in mock
* All build deps satisfied but see below; there's some extra ones.
* No locale files that need to be marked with %find_lang
* No shared libraries
* No bundled libraries
* Package is not relocatable
* No files listed more than once
* All files and directories created by the package owned by the package and no
others.
* Package contains code, not content.
* No large documentation that needs to be in a separate subpackage
* Nothing in %doc used at runtime
* No GUI application included so no .desktop requirement
* All filenames are valid utf-8
* No scriptlets
* No file dependencies
* No programs so no need for man pages

Needswork:
*You should use %global rather than %global
         
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define#current_usage_of_.25define_beneath_Packaging

Cosmetic:
* Speak with upstream about adding LICENSE to source:
        
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list