[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817

Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
         AssignedTo|ppisar at redhat.com           |nobody at fedoraproject.org
               Flag|fedora-review?              |

--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> 2011-01-31 04:31:50 EST ---
I understand perfectly. The guidelines says you should explicitly depend
because it can move to different package. At fist you can prevent problem now,
you do not need to wait for breaking things later. At second the package builds
even after `breakage'. It will just use old possibly buggy module. Adding
explicit dependency you assure using latest dual-lived package.

This question is not about willing or not willing. This is about compliance to
guidelines. As the spec file does not comply to guidelines statement I quoted
above, I cannot approve this package. You can try your luck with another
reviewer, although I think the guidelines are the same for all reviewers and
packagers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.