[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |rc040203 at freenet.de
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2011-01-31 05:24:33 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are trying to
> allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories.

Upstream perl reference please.

If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's
perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider
"Fedora" == "vendor".

Consider all of your packages which are not installing to vendor_dir blocked.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.