[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629

--- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2011-01-31 06:37:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are trying to
> > allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories.
> 
> Upstream perl reference please.
> 
> If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's
> perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider
> "Fedora" == "vendor".
> 
> Consider all of your packages which are not installing to vendor_dir blocked.

It was convention, but in F-13 were paths cut and vendor has the same path as
core perl. You didn't disagree with this change, which was similarly
fundamental.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.