[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324

nucleo <alekcejk at googlemail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alekcejk at googlemail.com

--- Comment #2 from nucleo <alekcejk at googlemail.com> 2011-07-10 15:08:08 EDT ---
rpmlint output for libkdcraw-4.6.90-3 rpms:

libkdcraw.i686: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More information
about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org.
libkdcraw.src: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More information
about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org.
libkdcraw.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More
information about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org.
libkdcraw-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
libkdcraw-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.

So description-line-too-long should be fixed.

update-desktop-database in %posttrans not needed because no desktop files
installed.

libkdcraw license is GPLv2+ but it built using libRaw sources which have
different licenses.
libRaw have license LGPLv2 or CDDL. It uses demosaic-pack-GPL2 and
demosaic-pack-GPL3 sources.
There is notes about demosaic-packs license in README.demosaic-packs:

Unfortunately, some of these methods are distributed under the terms of 
different versions of GNU General Public License (GPL). So it is not possible
to include implementation of these demosaics into the LibRaw distribution 
because LibRaw is distributed under more liberal licenses (LGPL and CDDL).

Of course, it is possible to distribute these demosaic methods in separate 
packages and use within LibRaw under following conditions:

 * LibRaw is used under the terms of LGPL license which is GPL-compatible
 * Resulting product (which uses LibRaw AND LibRaw-demosaic-pack) is licensed
   under GPL2+ (for GPL2 demosaic-pack) or GPL3+ (if demosaic-pack-GPL3 is
used).



So I guess that resulting License tag for libkdkraw should be GPLv2+ and
GPLv3+?

This README also can be added in %doc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.