[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820

--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-07-11 11:11:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)

ad 1) I was speaking about users who does not use RPM Ruby, e.g. Ruby installed
into /opt or using RVM. They will get overridden their default rdoc executable
by rubygems one and they don't care.

ad 3) Patch or alternatives, both methods are messy IMO. From my POV, the users
expects that they will use the gem version of RDoc as soon as they install the
gem. The question is how to fulfill the expectation the best. Also don't forget
that any solution we choose will present precedent for future.

So again, could you please shed more light on your alternatives proposal? What
version will be default? How the defaults will change, how the user will work
with them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.