[Bug 717966] Review Request: python-psphere - vSphere SDK for Python

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 12 17:24:03 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717966

--- Comment #10 from Chris Lalancette <clalance at redhat.com> 2011-07-12 13:24:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(python -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
> 
> Not needed anymore:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros

Ah, I had no idea about that one.  Fixed.

> 
> > %dir %attr(0755, root, root) %{python_sitelib}/psphere
> > %{python_sitelib}/psphere/*
> 
> A simple:
> 
>   %{python_sitelib}/psphere/

And fixed.

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > >   - There is no 0.1 release of psphere yet, so we should either wait for a
> > >     release or (uggh) get into:
> > > 
> > >      
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease
> > 
> > This is the nastiest one here.  When you run "python setup.py sdist" on the hg
> > sources, you get a tarball out that is named "psphere-0.1.tar.gz".  Given the
> > "Referencing_Source" link below, I feel like we should stick with that version
> > number, even though there is no official upstream release.
> 
> Nope, that doesn't cut it - upstream could release 0.1 some time in the future
> with newer code
> 
> 0.1 as a version number is meaningless right now - it doesn't refer to a
> specific version of the code
> 
> It sounds like you're in good contact with upstream - how about suggesting a
> release? That might be the simplest way of resolving it?
> 
> Otherwise, it should be python-vsphere-0.1-0.1.42accc3ffe67hg

I've written to the upstream maintainer, I'll wait on his reply.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list