[Bug 717019] Review Request: tncfhh - An open source implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) framework

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717019

--- Comment #1 from Jan F. Chadima <jchadima at redhat.com> 2011-07-13 07:16:15 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
OK: Warnings are the missing documentation and non stripped binaries.
rpmlint outputs are attached.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK: The package name is according all naming guidelines.

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK: The spec file name match the requested name.

MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
? OK: The package mostly fits all guidelines there are some exceptions found by
the rpmlint.  

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
FAIL: The license is inconsistent, mentions GPLv2, which is incompatible with.
It is basically a non-commercial-only license.

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
FAIL: The GPLv2 is mentioned in the spec file, the above licence is in the
package.

I reccomend to work with legal at lists.fedoraproject.org to solve the licensing
problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.