[Bug 721069] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-image - Commandline interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721069

--- Comment #9 from Mo Morsi <mmorsi at redhat.com> 2011-07-21 16:19:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Looks great to me now, still some whining from rpmlint:
> 
> $ rpmlint rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-3.fc14.noarch.rpm
> rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/PushCommand/combo_implemented%3f-i.yaml
> %3f
> rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/BuildCommand/combo_implemented%3f-i.yaml
> %3f
> rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/BaseCommand/is_file%3f-i.yaml
> %3f
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
> 
> But that looks like a false positive to me - %3f isn't an RPM macro

This occurs on every ruby package that includes ri documentation and can safely
be ignored.

> 
> Also, we need this:
> 
> - Requires: rubygem(image_factory_console) >= 0.4.0
> - Requires: rubygem(imagefactory-console) >= 0.4.0

Done


> 
> Finally, there's an upstream 0.0.1 release now. We should use that from an
> official URL rather than building our own gem

Done


Updated:
Spec: http://mo.morsi.org/files/aeolus/rubygem-aeolus-image.spec
SRPM:
http://mo.morsi.org/files/aeolus/rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-4.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.