[Bug 724859] NewLisp - Package Review - Lisp-like general scripting language

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724859

Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          QAContact|lemenkov at gmail.com          |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org

--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2011-07-24 05:52:36 EDT ---
I't almost ok exept what isn't :)

I made two patches (and rebased them all as well):

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/newlisp/

Patch #2 allows us to pass additional Fedora flags (in fact it overrides
default newlisp's ones, so, please examine which additional flags are required
for normal operation. For your info - I added them in comments above the line
with 'make' invocation.

Also I properly claimed ownership on all directories and removed excessive
stuff (no need to explicitly claim man-pages as %doc).

Please, take a look at this spec-file:

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/newlisp/newlisp.spec

and make sure that all these commented out gcc flags are not required (or
otherwise):

# -pedantic -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wno-long-long

After you confirm that it does work with the current CFLAGS, I'll continue
review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.