[Bug 712949] Review Request: gnome-online-accounts - Provide online accounts information

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 13 18:45:27 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712949

--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2011-06-13 14:45:26 EDT ---
These two files need to be in the main package, not in devel.

%{_libdir}/libgoa-1.0.so.0
%{_libdir}/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0

A few bits that need to be fixed up.

+ rpmlint output

rpmlint gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
gnome-online-accounts-devel-3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm gnome-online-accounts.spec 
gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink
/usr/lib64/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0.0.0
gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink
/usr/lib64/libgoa-1.0.so.0.0.0
gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0/README
gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0 libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0.0.0
gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/libgoa-1.0.so.0 libgoa-1.0.so.0.0.0
gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/goa-1.0/goabackend/goaeditablelabel.h
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ latest version packaged
- %doc includes license file
  doesn't include COPYING, README can be dropped as its empty
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  a98926706647d142175a0bcaf0e40fe9  gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0.tar.bz2
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested using koji scratch build
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3128535
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+
does not use Prefix: /usr
n/a package owns all directories it creates
n/a no duplicate files in %files
+ Package perserves timestamps on install
  Permissions on files must be set properly 
- %defattr line
  missing in devel subpackage
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package runtime 
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream to include it
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a non -devel packages should require fully versioned base
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
+ Package should have man files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list