[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 23 17:38:03 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954

--- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert at fedoraproject.org> 2011-06-23 13:38:02 EDT ---
Sorry, I am extremely busy and I lost interest in this package. Nevertheless I
updated it and fixed some more rpmlint warnings. Here is what I got:

SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree.spec
SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc16.src.rpm

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc16.*
cherrytree.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> ct, std, cad
cherrytree.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cherrytree
cherrytree.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> ct, std, cad
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

I think the quickest is to finish this review but in long term I'd like to have
somebody else (co-)maintain this package because I don't really use it.

(In reply to comment #23)
> The main point is that if %{_datadir}/application-registry/%{name}.applications
> is included, then this package must require gnome-mime-data, which provides the
> directory %{_datadir}/application-registry/ .

For the record: This is not correct, the file and directory ownership
guidelines were revisited already in March 2010 and do allow multiple directory
ownership to avoid unnecessary deps. Nevertheless I dropped
%{_datadir}/{application-registry,mime-info} because nothing is using it
anymore these days. It was last used in GNOME 2.18.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list