[Bug 716352] Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 28 18:12:31 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716352

Mario Blättermann <mariobl at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mariobl at freenet.de
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mariobl at freenet.de
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mariobl at freenet.de> 2011-06-28 14:12:29 EDT ---
Koji scratch build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3167503

$ rpmlint -i -v *
toothchart.src: I: checking
toothchart.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/toothchart/
(timeout 10 seconds)
toothchart.src: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/toothchart/toothchart-beta-0.02.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
toothchart.noarch: I: checking
toothchart.noarch: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/toothchart/
(timeout 10 seconds)
toothchart.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/toothchart/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.


Almost no issues, just the incorrect FSF address. You should file a bug
upstream, but it's no blocker for your package.

Informal review will follow immediately.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list