[Bug 717555] Review Request: packagedb-cli - A CLI for pkgdb

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717555

Elad Alfassa <el.il at doom.co.il> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Elad Alfassa <el.il at doom.co.il> 2011-06-29 05:04:08 EDT ---
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
- Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.
packagedb-cli.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pkgdb -> pkg db, pkg-db,
pkg
packagedb-cli.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkgdb-cli
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Can be ignored.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
packagedb-cli-1.0.0-2.fc15.noarch.rpm
packagedb-cli = 1.0.0-2.fc15
=
/usr/bin/python  
python-argparse  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1


SHOULD Items:

+ Should build in mock.
- Should build on all supported archs
+ Should function as described.
- Should have sane scriptlets.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
+ Should package latest version



APPROVED!



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.