[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 9 13:48:51 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071

Michal Novotny <minovotn at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(minovotn at redhat.c |needinfo?(tmraz at redhat.com)
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #4 from Michal Novotny <minovotn at redhat.com> 2011-03-09 08:48:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The tarball at the source URL and in the .src.rpm differs.
> 
> According to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme 
> the package should be named php-libvirt instead of libvirt-php.
> 


Well, originally the project was named php-libvirt but it got renamed to comply
with the names at http://libvirt.org/git . This was not my idea however I
already got used to the libvirt-php name.


> Note that you have included the html doc in both main package and the -doc
> subpackage. Also the %doc must be on the same line as the filename
> specification.


This is because rpmlint was complaining the main package was not having any
documentation. Shouldn't be I having it in the main package then?


> 
> The licensing is confusing/wrong - in the README you specify that the license
> is GPL (if so, there should be COPYING with the correct GPL version). In the
> .spec file there is License: PHP. The source files do not contain any copyright
> statements nor license names - these are not required but they are recommended.


Oh, I'll fix it. I guess this was done by multiple people contributing to this
so it made some kind of mess there however for the PHP modules the licence
should be a PHP licence, right? Or should be easily be GPL licence as well
since it's just about the module/extension?

Michal

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list