[Bug 676308] Review Request: rubygem-net-scp - A pure Ruby implementation of the SCP client protocol
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Mar 13 16:57:08 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676308
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2011-03-13 12:57:07 EDT ---
If you are still interested in importing this package into
Fedora, I will have a look at this one. Instead I will appreciate
it if you would review one of my review requests (e.g. bug 678678)
Some notes:
* Explicit version-specific Requires
- Please consider if you really have to write explicit
version-specific Requires like rubygems ">= 1.2".
* Usually when packages shipped on currently supported
Fedora branches all satisfy such version requirements,
we don't add such explicit version Requires:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
* Remove obsolete stuff
- rm -rf %{buildroot} at the top of %install is no longer needed
(if you intend to import this only on Fedora).
! Directly installing gem archive into %buildroot
- I always recommend to install gem archive once under %_builddir
to make it sure that no additional files are generated or files
are not modified after installation is done.
* For example, some testsuites generate additional executables
or log files or modify files, which frequently confuses %files
entry or leads to rpmbuild failure.
And because of the same reason, it is recommended that %buildroot
is touched only in %install section (i.e. executing %check under
%buildroot is discouraged).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list