[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129

--- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2011-03-18 15:25:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I must use ./configure instead macro. qconf don't use autotools configure. So
> number of macro arguments don't acceptable this ./configure. I trying used
> macro but get error.

I see. This is a sufficient reason.
Next I was going to suggest that you need to ensure %{optflags} are used in the
build ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Compiler_flags ), but
apparently this somehow works already. I made a scratch build and I can see the
familiar compiler flags in the g++ invocations ("-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fstack-protector ...").
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2923980
I do not understand where the ./configure script gets the flags from, so it may
or may not be the correct way.

> Also I wonder that it will prefer if i use .gz source tarball instead .bz2 .

You can choose whichever you like more. bz2 practically always achieves better
compression than gz, so most packagers select bz2 when choosing between the
two.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.