[Bug 683463] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 19 16:59:52 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463

Zhao Yongming <ming.zym at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|BuildFails                  |

--- Comment #5 from Zhao Yongming <ming.zym at gmail.com> 2011-03-19 12:59:51 EDT ---
I have update to 2.1.6-2, which fixed the building issue and other Fedora
tweak.
http://yum.zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/2.1.6-2/

passed x86_64 native building and i386 mock building.

and here is the rpmlint information
[root at unknown-10-62-163-x SPECS]# rpmlint
/root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/trafficserver-devel-2.1.6-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
trafficserver-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
trafficserver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
trafficserver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tsxs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[root at unknown-10-62-163-x SPECS]# rpmlint
/root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/trafficserver-2.1.6-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
trafficserver.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_cop
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_shell
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/trafficserver/plugins/conf_remap.so
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_sac
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsmgmt.so.2.1.6
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_server
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_logcat
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_manager
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_line
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/traffic_logstats
trafficserver.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.2.1.6
trafficserver.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/etc/trafficserver/body_factory/default/.body_factory_info
trafficserver.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/trafficserver
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_shell
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_line
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_server
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_manager
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_sac
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_cop
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_logstats
trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_logcat
trafficserver.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/trafficserver
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 22 warnings.

things I am still tracking:
1, static libary, the -devel package have .la file, from the Guideline that is
not a good way, I am still investing how to avoid it with upstream.

2, extra platform testing, may need to find out others.

for things that will take into action:
1, v2.1.7 will be released out next Monday, I will catch it up.
2, most patch for Fedora tweak is not in upstream trunk, will push it after we
have done the most reviews.

thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list