[Bug 691032] Review Request: pyinputstats - An application for mouse and keyboard statistics

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 26 12:56:26 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691032

Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel
                   |                            |ess.net)

--- Comment #1 from Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> 2011-03-26 08:56:25 EDT ---
Here is the review:

 +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing

MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
> $ grep ^License pyInputStats-0.2.1/PKG-INFO pyinputstats.spec
> pyInputStats-0.2.1/PKG-INFO:License: GPLv3
> pyinputstats.spec:License:        GPLv2+

[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
> $ wget -O pyInputStats-0.2.1.tar.gz.upstream 'http://launchpad.net/pyinputstats/trunk/1.0/+download/pyInputStats-0.2.1.tar.gz'
> $ sha1sum pyInputStats-0.2.1.tar.gz*
> 88da239d62b7bc7cb88984b58de5575c0bdcd703  pyInputStats-0.2.1.tar.gz
> 88da239d62b7bc7cb88984b58de5575c0bdcd703  pyInputStats-0.2.1.tar.gz.upstream

[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

SHOULD Items:
[=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2948325

[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
>   2948326 buildArch (pyinputstats-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
> 2948325 build (dist-f15, pyinputstats-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully

[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.


Summary:
The spec looks good, the package builds and works fine. Please update the
license and possibly contact upstream to include a COPYING file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list