[Bug 611068] Review Request: django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 26 17:31:32 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611068
Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel |
|ess.net) |
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2011-03-26 13:31:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It looks like Django needs the empty models.py file in order to load the app --
> could you please confirm this before I approve this review? (a comment in the
> spec file would have been nice, to save me from researching this myself :) )
I'm sorry that you wasted your time because of my lazyness. Yes, the model.py
is needed. I'm saying this without being an expert on Django modules.
Updated files:
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/django-picklefield.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/django-picklefield-0.1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list