[Bug 611068] Review Request: django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 26 17:31:32 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611068

Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel |
                   |ess.net)                    |

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2011-03-26 13:31:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It looks like Django needs the empty models.py file in order to load the app --
> could you please confirm this before I approve this review? (a comment in the
> spec file would have been nice, to save me from researching this myself :) )

I'm sorry that you wasted your time because of my lazyness. Yes, the model.py
is needed. I'm saying this without being an expert on Django modules.

Updated files:
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/django-picklefield.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/django-picklefield-0.1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list