[Bug 691195] Review Request: wmnet - Network monitoring dockapp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Mar 27 18:06:13 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691195

--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> 2011-03-27 14:06:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm in doubt if this is a real project homepage.

I'm not sure either, but the name Katharine Osborne is also mentioned in the
manpage (as the manpage author) together with her email address.


> The contact links are dead, I don't expect to find a responsible developer
> anywhere. As I already wrote, we should use GPLv2 here, due to the age of the
> sources. Or should we keep GPL in general, without versioning?

The License field must contain the license of the binary package. If no GPL
version is given, "GPL+" must be used (I forgot the "+" above). As you removed
the bundled getopt sources, getopt_long() is taken from the shared glibc
library. Thus, the resulting license of the package is indeed GPL+. If getopt
were linked statically, we would get GPLv2+.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list