[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 26 16:12:50 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2011-05-26 12:12:49 EDT ---
Well, because both are independent projects, they should be two separate
packages, isn't it?
But I surely understand the trouble with updating both packages independently,
because I don't believe upstream will have nicely building packages.

How about trying to build the new givaro, then fflas-ffpack and then the new
linbox locally, and if it works as expected, add this package separately?

I don't quite see, how all in one source package would solve this more
easily... Then you would also need to build one after the other and could
always run into problems.
Maybe building fflas-ffpack without linbox support would work, then build
linbox against fflas-ffpack and then add linbox support (if there is any).
Right now, linbox is only needed in an utils header file with ifdef's around,
so I don't see a problem, when no linbox is around.

Where do you think is BR: linbox needed? I only see a R on linbox...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list