[Bug 706832] Review Request: hibernate-commons-annotations - Hibernate Annotations

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706832

Jaromír Cápík <jcapik at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |jcapik at redhat.com

--- Comment #5 from Jaromír Cápík <jcapik at redhat.com> 2011-05-27 09:42:43 EDT ---
Hi Marek.

The problem is, that the mentioned link always points to the latest LGPL
version (what could be at the moment understood as LGPLv3+ or not).
Unfortunately the LGPLv3 doesn't seem to specify an exact statement and that's
why it would be better to have a full license text included in the package to
avoid confusions.
Please, ask the upstream to include the license file in the source package.

The following text is taken directly from the Licensing Guidelines:
In cases where the licensing is unclear, it may be necessary to contact the
copyright holders to confirm the licensing of code or content. In those
situations, it is _always_ preferred to ask upstream to resolve the licensing
confusion by documenting the licensing and releasing an updated tarball.
However, this is not always possible to achieve. In such cases, it is
acceptable to receive confirmation of licensing via email. A copy of the email,
containing full headers, must be included as a source file (marked as %doc) in
the package. This file is considered part of the license text.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.