[Bug 750013] Review Request: clucene09 - A C++ port of Lucene

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 4 10:35:50 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750013

--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2011-11-04 06:35:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> clucene09-core.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
> /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/README
> The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8.  Consider converting it in
> the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1).
> 
> clucene09-core.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/LGPL.license
> This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or
> modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed
> correctly in some circumstances.

Sorry. I will correct those.

> clucene09-core.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/LGPL.license
> The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
> misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
> possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

As mentioned in comment #1, this is an older version of the package just for
compatibility reasons. Newer upstream versions should have a proper address.
AFAIK this is not a blocker.

> clucene09-core-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
> 
> Either correct this or comment on the rational for this placement in the spec.

Will be "clucene-config.h is arch/platform specific and must be installed in 
%{_libdir}" enough clarification? See also bug #381481 for some more details,
please.

> clucene09-core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
> documentation files.

IIRC this is no must and there is nothing really useful I could include.


Would you like an updated package/spec file because of point 1 and 3?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list