[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510

--- Comment #14 from Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce at redhat.com> 2011-11-10 05:16:50 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I am fixing the spec file to build unmodified on SUSE.
> 
> On SUSE we require that a package either owns its directories or it
> BuildRequires the packages owning them. vdsm fails here:
> 
> vdsm-4.9.1-0.4.g1bf3028.i586.rpm: directories not owned by a package:
>  - /etc/pki
>  - /etc/rwtab.d
>  - /etc/sudoers.d

I'm not sure if I can help you with these, the directories are owned by:
filesystem, initscripts and sudo.
As far as I remember I read somewhere that it's preferable to not add
BuildRequires of packages that are automatically included by mock.

Richard, what do you think?

>  - /etc/vdsm
>  - /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos
>  - /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins
>  - /usr/lib/vdsm/hooks
>  - /var/lib/libvirt
>  - /var/lib/libvirt/qemu

I've no problem adding these BuildRequires. You can send a patch to
vdsm-patches at fedorahosted.org (cc me too).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.