[Bug 754185] Review Request: mingw32-p11-kit - MinGW package for p11-kit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 15 20:24:54 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754185

Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kalevlember at gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> 2011-11-15 15:24:53 EST ---
Good work with packaging it up!

One thing I'd change here is the source package name. Right now Fedora only has
the 32 bit MinGW cross toolchain, but we're planning to also add the 64 bit
toolchain support in the future. The way it's planned is that there would be
one source package, producing separate 32 bit and 64 bit binary rpms.

Because of that, the current MinGW guidelines suggest that newly imported
packages should name the source package with the mingw- prefix, so you'd have
mingw-p11-kit srpm producing mingw32-p11-kit binary rpm:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Example_Specfile

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list