[Bug 744339] Review Request: dieharder - Random number generator tester and timer
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 15 21:52:05 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744339
--- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2011-11-15 16:52:04 EST ---
Ok! We're almost there, I promise!
In doing my formal review (and therefore more in depth) I did notice a couple
of things which should all be pretty simple to fix.
1. In your Source0: tag go ahead and replace all instances of "dieharder" with
%{name}. (nit pick)
2. The source has a very clear separation of libdieharder from the binary,
including separate COPYING, NOTES, and README.
I think the *BEST* way of handling this is to go ahead and create a separate
subpackage for the library. That way it can have it's own %doc. Just let me
know if you need any help. You'll need to add an arch specific "Require:" for
the library package in the main package.
If you're opposed to doing that, then at a minimum you should rename the doc
files in the libdieharder source to append ".lib" to each of them and add them
to your existing %doc.
3. There's a manual directory which includes latex based documentation that
when built produces a pdf. I would normally describe the process here but I
already added it to my copy of your spec file so I'll just attach it here
instead for your review.
I also ended up creating a separate libs package :) Feel free to use it or not,
it just seems like the author designed the library to be both with or separate
from the binary.
Richard
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list