[Bug 754879] Review Request: kup - Kernel.org Uploader

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 18 15:32:11 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754879

Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(icon at fedoraprojec
                   |                            |t.org)

--- Comment #1 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> 2011-11-18 10:32:11 EST ---
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
- Spec file matches base package name.
- Spec has consistant macro usage.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
- License
- License field in spec matches
- License file included in package
- Spec in American English
- Spec is legible.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:

Upstream doesn't release tarballs, but the git checkout of kup-0.3 matches

- BuildRequires correct
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
- Package has a correct %clean section.
- Package is code or permissible content.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
- Package has no duplicate files in %files.
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
- No rpmlint output.

[jwboyer at zod kup]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kup-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
kup.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographically ->
photographically, typographically, topographically
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[jwboyer at zod kup]$ rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kup-server-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
kup-server.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographically ->
photographically, typographically, topographically
kup-server.noarch: W: non-ghost-in-var-run /var/run/kup
kup-server.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/kup/tmp 01777L
kup-server.noarch: W: non-ghost-in-var-run /var/run/kup/lock
kup-server.noarch: E: zero-length /var/run/kup/lock
kup-server.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kup-server
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.
[jwboyer at zod kup]$ rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kup-server-utils-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
kup-server-utils.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographically -> photographically, typographically, topographically
kup-server-utils.noarch: W: no-documentation
kup-server-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gpg-sign-all
kup-server-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary genrings
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[jwboyer at zod kup]$ rpmlint kup-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm 
kup.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographically ->
photographically, typographically, topographically
kup.src: W: invalid-url Source0: kup-0.3.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[jwboyer at zod kup]$ 

The warnings can be ignored, but the errors might need to be fixed.

You should probably add a:

Requires: gnupg2

as well.  Otherwise gpg-sign-all and genrings aren't going to work very well.

Other than that, it looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list