[Bug 756321] Review Request: csmith - Tool to generate random C programs for compiler testing

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 23 09:30:51 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321

--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan at gmail.com> 2011-11-23 04:30:50 EST ---
$ rpmlint SPECS/csmith.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint SRPMS/csmith-2.1.0-1.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/csmith-2.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm 
csmith.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/compiler_test.in
csmith.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csmith
csmith.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary launchn.pl
csmith.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary compiler_test.pl
csmith.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary test_csmith.pl
csmith.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary compiler_test.in
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/csmith-devel-2.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm 
csmith-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
csmith-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/csmith-2.1.0/stdint_ia32.h
csmith-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/csmith-2.1.0/stdint_avr.h
csmith-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/csmith-2.1.0/stdint_msp430.h
csmith-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/csmith-2.1.0/custom_limits.h
csmith-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/csmith-2.1.0/stdint_ia64.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings.

I will inform upstream to fix the FSF address.

Successful Koji builds for F15, F16 and F17:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3534326
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3534329
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3534330

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list