[Bug 746438] Review Request: rubygem-cairo - Ruby bindings for cairo

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746438

Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vondruch at redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-11-28 05:53:35 EST ---
* Update to the latest version
  - Time is passing fast, could you please update to the latest version?

* Is it worth of including ruby- subpackage?
  - Isn't this re-review good opportunity to get rid of the ruby- subpackage?
    The design is flawed IMO and doesn't bring anything of benefit for users.

* Remove the -devel subpackage.
  - Is the -devel package required? Will somebody prepare some other library
with
    binary extension which will depend on cairo? What is your opinion?

* defattr macros are no longer necessary
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions

* Use ruby(rubygems) virtual provide preferably

* The license should be Ruby or GPLv2
  - Since the COPYING file states "distributed under the same conditions as
ruby",
    the license should be adjusted appropriately.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.