[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 4 09:02:48 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079

--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at redhat.com> 2011-10-04 05:02:47 EDT ---
I really does not understood why you define macro oname and why not use
directly %{name} which has same value?

Why you specify Epoch? It is not needed when it is zero.

Just asking about these two. I do not require change for these two.

Quartz 2.1.0 has been release on 23 September 2011. You may consider to rebase.

Beside those mentioned issue above it looks good.

Please fix #1 and #2, consider the rebase and it will be good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list