[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079

--- Comment #4 from Andy Grimm <agrimm at gmail.com> 2011-10-04 17:49:53 EDT ---
The oname macro and epoch of 0 were left over from the jpackage spec, where the
package name was quartz16.  An undefined epoch is not the same as an epoch of
zero last I checked, but you are right that it shouldn't be needed.

As for the upgrade to 2.1.0, that's going to require some investigation.  From
a distribution standpoint, I understand that we want to package the latest
stable versions of software.  I'll need to figure out how much of a challenge
it will be to migrate Eucalyptus to use 2.1.0, though, as that's my primary
motivation for doing this packaging work.  Since the Quartz website no longer
even mentions 1.6.x, though, it's clear that we need to move to some newer
version (1.8, 2.0, or 2.1).  I need to put this package on hold for a bit. 
Thanks for pointing this out.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.