[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088

Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vondruch at redhat.com

--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-10-10 03:56:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> They also have dropped the non-gem use for rubygems (it's not updated in
> packaging guidelines!).

I proposed this change, since the non-gem use is bad designed and I can't see
any benefit of such packages. However, there was not much done WRT update of
packaging guidelines, but I'll try to collect some ideas in [1]. Going to add
this proposal right now.


(In reply to comment #3)
> Sounds good. Good to know that the packaging rubygems for non-gem use guideline
> is going away, feel free to remove the non-gem subpackage from this altogether
> if you want (this was the first package that I've seen do this in a very long
> time).
> 
> Also how definite is it that Ruby 1.9.3 is going into Fedora 17?
> 
> Thank you.

I am highly interested in R 1.9.3 in F17 and I did not heard any strong
objections, so it is highly probable that I will push them forward. Of course,
you can check Ruby-SIG ML as was mentioned by Shawn.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_talk:Ruby

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.