[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510

--- Comment #2 from Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce at redhat.com> 2011-10-13 05:52:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is there a technical reason for the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ? We (the secondary
> architectures) prefer to build packages on all possible architectures.

At the moment I am not aware of technical reasons for not building it on
secondary architectures. Sadly I cannot guarantee that it will actually work
(especially the safelease part) and that its interaction with the other
components will be optimal. Moreover it will require libvirt and kvm for most
of the tasks so I'm not sure what would be used for on secondary architectures.

Anyway if it's just easier and more consistent to build it for all the
architectures we could try to fix the build errors (if any).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.