[Bug 738590] Review request: rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails - Simple FastGettext Rails integration
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 25 11:48:09 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738590
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-10-25 07:48:08 EDT ---
* Update to the latest version
- Please consider updating to the latest version of gem. It seems it should
incorporate the failed tests fix.
* License is not clear
- The license should be "Public Domain and MIT", however I rose the question
upstream to clarify [1]
* Please keep the note [2] about the "bundled" ruby_gettext_extractor
in the spec file
* Exclude the cached gem
- The cached gem has no meaning in Fedora. I would suggest to use the
following line in your spec:
%exclude %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
* Keep Readme.md in the main package
- The file contains the license information. It would be fine to keep it
in the main package.
* Keep the VERSION file in main package
- This file is required by runtime:
irb(main):002:0> require 'rubygems'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> require 'gettext_i18n_rails'
Errno::ENOENT: No such file or directory - /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems
/gettext_i18n_rails-0.2.20/lib/../VERSION
from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_i18n_rails-0.2.20
/lib/gettext_i18n_rails.rb:2:in `read'
from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_i18n_rails-0.2.20
/lib/gettext_i18n_rails.rb:2
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:59:in
`gem_original_require'
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:59:in
`require'
from (irb):3
from /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rbconfig.rb:172
- Note that it should not be marked by %doc macro in this case.
[1] https://github.com/grosser/gettext_i18n_rails/issues/37
[2] https://github.com/retoo/ruby_gettext_extractor/issues/4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list