[Bug 745233] Review Request: python-logbook - A logging replacement for Python

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 28 08:30:47 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745233

--- Comment #7 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu at gmail.com> 2011-10-28 04:30:46 EDT ---
I have reported two issues upstream:
https://github.com/mitsuhiko/logbook/issues/42
https://github.com/mitsuhiko/logbook/issues/43

The tests run OK in Python 2. But I am afraid this package cannot be approved
until the Python 3 tests show good, unless you disable the Python 3 subpackage.

And I found some test utilizes jinja2, which should be added to BR:
./test_regular.py:1096:    @require('jinja2')
./test_regular.py:1288:    @require('zmq')
./test_regular.py:1306:    @require('zmq')
./test_regular.py:1336:    @require('multiprocessing')
./test_regular.py:1382:    @require('execnet')
./test_regular.py:1401:    @require('multiprocessing')
./test_regular.py:1437:    @require('sqlalchemy')


And python3-execnet has been available in Fedora 16 and later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list