[Bug 750013] New: Review Request: clucene09 - A C++ port of Lucene

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 29 22:34:39 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: clucene09 - A C++ port of Lucene

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750013

           Summary: Review Request: clucene09 - A C++ port of Lucene
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: unspecified
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com,
                    package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: ---


Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/clucene09.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/clucene09-0.9.21b-1.src.rpm
Description:
CLucene is a C++ port of Lucene. It is a high-performance, full-
featured text search engine written in C++. CLucene is faster than
lucene as it is written in C++.

This package contains an old and deprecated version of clucene. You
need it only if the software you are using has not been updated to
work with the newer version and the newer API.


This package is meant as a compatibility package for Fedora 16+ and RHEL 7+,
because the up-to-date clucene-2.3.3.4-1 breaks API and ABI compatibility.
Not all software depending on CLucene API has been adapted to work with the
new changed APIs. The package is simply the last 0.9.21b package from Koji
and was renamed to be installed in parallel with current clucene versions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list