[Bug 736015] Review Request: fedfs-utils - Utilities for mounting and managing FedFS domains

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736015

--- Comment #6 from Jeff Layton <jlayton at redhat.com> 2011-09-12 13:49:40 EDT ---
I've uploaded a newer fedfs-utils SRPM and specfile to my fedorapeople page:

    http://fedorapeople.org/~jlayton/fedfs-utils/0.7.0-2/

I think this addresses almost all of the things that rpmlint complained about.
The only exceptions are:

1) the complaints about "namespace" and "automounted". I'd argue that those
are valid terms and the dictionary just lacks them for whatever reason. I'd
suggest that we just ignore those warnings. If that's not acceptable, then
I suppose we could change them, but I'd rather not.

2) I did not change the layout/number of packages. We could reduce the
number of packages if that's necessary, but this breaks things up in a
reasonably granular way such that clients and admin machines won't need to
have unnecessary binaries installed. I'm flexible on this point however if
the reviewers think that this many packages is overkill. We could even
reduce it to one single package -- after all, we ship nfs-utils as a single
package...

3) I didn't worry about the resolve-junction manpage since that program is
going away (as Chuck points out).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.