[Bug 735131] Review Request: cantor - KDE Frontend to Mathematical Software

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 21 08:16:40 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735131

Radek Novacek <rnovacek at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |rnovacek at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |rnovacek at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Radek Novacek <rnovacek at redhat.com> 2011-09-21 04:16:40 EDT ---
Name: ok
License: source is GPLv2+, specfile says LGPLv2+
Source: ok
BRs/Reqs: ok
Macros used consistently: ok
ldconfig: ok
Desktop file validations: ok
Locales: ok
Docs: COPYING not installed
Devel: ok
Files: ok
Build: ok
rpmlint: no need to fix
cantor.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/applications/kde4/cantor.desktop
cantor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cantor
cantor-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cantor-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time,
Run-time, Rudiment
cantor-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run
time, Run-time, Rudiment
cantor-libs.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libcantor_config.so
libcantor_config.so
cantor-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cantor-R.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end,
back-end
cantor-R.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed,
back end, back-end
cantor-R.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cantor-R.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cantor_rserver

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list