[Bug 738057] Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 23 16:30:35 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738057

--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2011-09-23 12:30:34 EDT ---
$ rpmlint semantik
semantik.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/usr/lib64/libQtWebKit.so.4
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/usr/lib64/libQtNetwork.so.4
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/lib64/libm.so.6
semantik.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnablah.so
/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
semantik.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary semantik
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.

Mostly harmless here. libnablah.so in particular seems to be a convenience
library, so no soname isn't much of an issue.

naming: OK

sources: OK
$ md5sum *.bz2
0eb6f38b56390815e33e11505eb85ee2  semantik-0.7.3.tar.bz2

licensing: OK

scriptlets: OK

macros: OK

no issues.

APPROVED.


What's your FAS username?  Given that, I'll get the sponsor-ball rolling.


lastly, I'd urge you to contact upstream developers about the patches used
here, the desktop file and ocaml compatibility in particular.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list