[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971

--- Comment #34 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> 2011-09-29 19:48:24 EDT ---
> Do you suggest to modify to .spec file so that to avoid advertising
> them as provided?

For the versioned libraries that would be better. Not mandatory however with
our current guidelines. Primarly I want you to be aware of this.

Even if currently there are no other packages in the package collection, which
share these library names, it is not nice to pollute the global namespace with
versioned SONAME Provides.

# repoquery --whatrequires libAggregation.so.1
freemedforms-devel-0:0.5.9-0.1.alpha1.fc16.i686

If we didn't had a base package dependency in the guidelines, this would break
here already.

[...]

> Does it also mean that qt-creator and freemedforms should also be revised?

freemedforms is mispackaged IMO: bug 742396

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.