[Bug 226534] Merge Review: vte

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 3 18:12:43 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226534

Jon Ciesla <limburgher at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |kevin at scrye.com,
                   |                            |limburgher at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |limburgher at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher at gmail.com> 2012-04-03 14:12:40 EDT ---
Adding maintainer, fresh review.

Good:

- rpmlint checks return:

vte.spec:516: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 58, tab: line 516)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

Trivial to fix.

vte.src: W: no-url-tag
The URL tag is missing.

I'd suggest http://developer.gnome.org/vte/.

vte-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vte
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

Unsure.

Lots and lots of incorrect fsf address, will be addressed when this gets
updated.

vte.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gtk-2.0/vtemodule.so vtemodule.so()(64bit)
A shared object soname provides is provided by a file in a path from which
other packages should not directly load shared objects from.  Such shared
objects should thus not be depended on and they should not result in provides
in the containing package.  Get rid of the provides if appropriate, for
example by filtering it out during build.  Note that in some cases this may
require disabling rpmbuild's internal dependency generator.

Fix or comment.

vte.x86_64: E: setgid-binary /usr/lib64/vte/gnome-pty-helper utmp 02711L
The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game, then,
you should use the proper rpm group, or location.

vte.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/vte/gnome-pty-helper
02711L
A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files
included in your package.

vte.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/vte/gnome-pty-helper
02711L
A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files
included in your package.

Likely OK.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( LGPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

Pretty good, let me know if you want me to commit any fixes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list