[Bug 810059] opencl-utils - Useful OpenCL tools and utilities

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810059

--- Comment #8 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> 2012-04-06 03:54:05 EDT ---
Basically, its all about the Makefile. Although it's extremely small, it's
broken: the dependencies are wrong, make clean is incomplete, it does not
respect CFLAGS.

I attach a new Makefile. It's so small that a diff makes no sense. It can be
used something like this:

env CFLAGS="%{optflags} -Wl,-soname=libcrun.so.%{version}" make

Doing so, the debuginfo thing should be solver as well as the missing
%{optflags}

I'm still worried about the packages. Basically, this is just a library and as
such the "standard procedure" would be:

Base package: opencl-utils: *.so.*, %doc e. g. the example files.
Devel package: the header files
debug packagge.

I just don't see why this should be different. Why package the complete
sources? Why have a separate package for for clrun? In particular, packaging
sources in the include directory is plain wrong IMHO. If they need to be
packaged (why) they should live somewhere else e. g. in /usr/share/opencl-utils
or just as %doc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.