[Bug 807566] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-iok - gnome-shell extension for iok application
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 12 07:29:23 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807566
Daiki Ueno <dueno at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno <dueno at redhat.com> 2012-04-12 03:29:22 EDT ---
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
According to extenson.js header, it seems GPLv2+, not GPLv2.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-iok-0.20120328-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
gnome-shell-extension-iok.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
keymap -> key map, key-map, mapmaker
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-iok-0.20120328-1.fc18.src.rpm
gnome-shell-extension-iok.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keymap
-> key map, key-map, mapmaker
gnome-shell-extension-iok.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
pnemade-gnome-shell-extension-iok-13a043e.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[!]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues:
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-iok-0.20120328-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
gnome-shell-extension-iok.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
keymap -> key map, key-map, mapmaker
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Looks harmless.
rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-iok-0.20120328-1.fc18.src.rpm
gnome-shell-extension-iok.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keymap
-> key map, key-map, mapmaker
gnome-shell-extension-iok.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
pnemade-gnome-shell-extension-iok-13a043e.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Why don't you add a tag at github to generate static download link like this?
https://github.com/ueno/libskk/tarball/0.0.12
[!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
Perhaps good to include COPYING file.
[!]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
I think this is not applicable since you will need bunch of translations :)
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list